Microservices vs Monolithic
Breaking Down Software Architecture: Choosing Between Microservices and Monoliths
Definition: Small, independent software components for specific business functions.
Autonomy: Operate independently, communicate through APIs.
Modularity: Developed, deployed, and scaled independently.
Scalability and flexibility.
Resilience and fault tolerance.
Support for continuous deployment.
Distributed systems issues.
Decision Factors: Consider project-specific needs before adopting a microservices architecture.
Definition: Monolithic are single, unified software applications where all components are interconnected.
Architecture: All functionalities tightly integrated into a single codebase.
Single deployable unit.
Shared database and components.
Development, deployment, and scaling are unified.
Simplicity in development and deployment.
Easier to manage and test as a single unit.
Lack of modularity.
Scaling challenges for specific features.
Technology stack is uniform.
Decision Factors: Suitable for simpler projects or when a unified technology stack and ease of development are prioritized.
Which one is the best?
The choice between microservices and monolithic depends on various factors, and there isn't a one-size-fits-all answer. Each architecture has its strengths and weaknesses, and the decision should align with the specific requirements and goals of your project. Here's a brief comparison to help you make an informed decision:
Question time 🙋🏿♂️
Thanks for reading Amigoscode Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.